Family and relationships question:

RESPECT - the so-called "accreditor" of CAFCASS approved DPP programmes - attendance on which may be required when a court makes a "contact activity order", has had its principles declared "unsafe" and should be "abandoned" by an up-to-date research review article. This would seem to imply that CAFCASS is advocating and sponsoring programmes which are unsafe from children's perspectives. Which groups of people need to know about this in order to improve the potential safety for children?

posted in Family and relationships | answer this question

Flag as objectionable